Evolution and its Relation to Christianity
This is
probably going to be one of those posts that is going to get me in quite a bit
of trouble. Ever since the Origin of Species by Charles Darwin, the topic of
evolution has been a controversial topic. Before one goes much further though,
I feel that evolution must be defined. When evolution is used, it is actually a
blanket statement for two specific processes. One of these processes is
micro-evolution, which is the optimization of a species through the natural
selection for the genes that allow individuals to survive and pass on their genes.
The other term is macro-evolution, which is the attempt to use the mechanisms
of micro-evolution and natural selection to account for the origin of life.
So
where does religion come into play here? One could start by looking at
macro-evolution, as micro-evolution is a really well-defined field and is seen
in the world we see today. People could also argue against macro-evolution,
which would say that life gradually evolved to become what we see today, by
saying that we have not seen the species jump that supposedly happened in the
past. Why don’t we see the species change over the years? Darwin’s finches
optimized their gene pool and gained longer beaks, shorter wings, etc., but
they were still finches.
One
could also use the origin of information here. Intelligence is always inferred
when information is found. This is similar to going to Mars and finding a
McDonald’s hamburger wrapper. You wouldn’t assume that the wrapper was formed
by unguided processes, your first thought would probably be that someone was
there before you and brought lunch that was made by intelligent hands. This is
one of the basic ideas for the Intelligent Design school of thought. When it
comes to information, one must have a mind behind that information for it to
have any sort of meaning. This argument gets applied to DNA, which stores all
of the information needed to construct any living organism. There have been
studies and comments made that DNA stores information as a digital sequence,
much like a computer. So if the information in DNA is analogous to a designed
computer, why is it a childish conclusion to say that there is a designer? From
the gospel of John, “In the beginning was the Word…”. The Word was the Logos,
or the reason. God created the universe according to the principles that he saw
fit to impose on the universe. This is only a quick blurb from myself and some
of it I am using from talks by John Lennox and Ravi Zacharias, so feel free to
go to those two’s sites to see their thoughts on the subject. God bless and
have a good rest of your week.
"Ever since the Origin of Species by Charles Darwin, the topic of evolution has been a controversial topic."
ReplyDeleteIt hasn't been a controversial topic in the way you are suggesting for at least 100 years.
"So where does religion come into play here? One could start by looking at macro-evolution, as micro-evolution is a really well-defined field and is seen in the world we see today. People could also argue against macro-evolution, which would say that life gradually evolved to become what we see today, by saying that we have not seen the species jump that supposedly happened in the past."
First of all, macro-evolution is the compounding of micro effects. Second of all, unless you're going to be more specific about "the species jump" bit, you haven't made an argument. In any case, you may like to browse this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transitional_fossils
"One could also use the origin of information here. Intelligence is always inferred when information is found."
You're going to have to be more precise about your definition of information, but I can't think of any commonly accepted (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_theory) view of information that says that "intelligence should be inferred".
"This is similar to going to Mars and finding a McDonald’s hamburger wrapper."
No. No, it isn't. Not even a little bit. Unless you also find other things that are similar but not identical in structure and function and reproduce with minor genetic mutations which are under selective pressures. Also, your McDonald's hamburger wrapper would have to do this for your analogy to make any sense.
"This is only a quick blurb from myself and some of it I am using from talks by John Lennox and Ravi Zacharias..."
Lennox (from a quick Google) looks legit, but Zacharias has said that evolution is incompatible with the second law of thermodynamics. I hope you don't buy into that kind of reasoning.