The Bible is not a science textbook, here’s why that is ok
I wanted to do
a short little essay on why I think the Bible is not a science textbook, and why
I think that is ok. We have plenty of sciences being studied that do not stir
up much controversy among the religious communities, but we do have this
supposed showdown over scripture vs evolution. The Bible was written not to
communicate the mechanisms behind the operation of life and the universe, but
to talk about the divine inspiration of humanity, the nature of our fallen
state as humans separated by God, the wonderful love and mercy that God has on
us by sacrificing his only son to restore the God-human relationship, and the
ultimate destiny of mankind should they choose the gift of salvation offered by
Jesus or reject it.
Now, I do hold
my doctorate in Chemistry, and I teach university courses in Chemistry and I
advocate that science and faith are not mutually exclusive. Just because I
think that the Bible is not the place to learn science does not mean that the
Bible is scientifically inaccurate. Granted, there are multiple interpretations
of Genesis 1 and 2 that lead to schools of thought like Intelligent Design and
Theistic Evolution, but the point of this post is not to defend of critique any
of these sets of ideas. Rather, let us look at the Bible as a whole, and pick
out some examples of scripture and science agreeing.
First off, the
beginning of the universe. In the ancient world, and even up until recently,
the universe was thought to be “past eternal”, with the idea of a universe
beginning being chalked up to religious fanaticism. Georges Lemaître (a Belgian Priest I might add) proposed
the Big Bang theory in the 1920s, and the name “Big Bang” was given as a joke
because people scoffed at the idea, and the name stuck. Then the experimental evidence
from Hubble came in, showing a “red shift” of background radiation from the universe,
indicating universal expansion, which extrapolates back to a time finite
beginning for the universe, showing that the Bible is scientifically accurate
in that sense.
As
I said before, I will not go into Genesis 1 and 2 rigorously here, because I
think that deserves it’s own series of posts, but I will venture in and look at
one detail of the origin of man, that we are made from the dust of the earth.
We can see that man is physically made up of the same elements that we find on
earth around us, which shows at minimum an anecdotal connection of scripture
and science. We see many, many more of these relationships that build a very
interesting case for the scientific accuracy of scripture. The ceremonial
cleanliness laws for Israel shown in Deuteronomy and elsewhere in the Old Testament,
actually did help to prevent bacterial and viral diseases from spreading (such
as burying excrement outside of the camp and not touching blood or dead
carcasses). We can go back to universal expansion and look at verses that talk
about God “stretching out the heavens” (though I think that one may be reaching
a bit by using a literalistic English interpretation, but I just want to get
people thinking). We see the idea of seasons and cyclical patterns in Daniel,
Ecclesiastes, and elsewhere in scripture. I could go on, but I think I will
stop with one last one. With regards to the flood of Noah, many people argue
about whether it was a global or local flood, or if it happened at all. I personally
follow the idea of a global flood, because we have plenty of anecdotal evidence
from ancient cultures around the world about a disastrous flood. I know the sea
and water have a primal effect on human imagination, but I do find it interesting
that almost every ancient culture that I have studied has some form of flood
mythology, and I think that stems from the repopulation of the Earth through
Noah’s bloodline as described in scripture.
Have
you thought about the relation of scripture and science? What are you thoughts
on the subject? Let’s have a conversation and see if we can find a deeper
understanding of God’s creation and his Word to us humans. God bless and have a
good rest of your day.
References:
Comments
Post a Comment